leica m240 vs m262 image quality

On 12/27/2020 at 11:24 AM, a.noctilux said: On 12/27/2020 at 12:24 PM, a.noctilux said: Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount , https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. To a degree, I can see their point too. As John said it beforeendless upgrades, hours to spend to edit files, digital, you take even more picturesthe iso dial is nice, but I prefer (for the sake of creativity versus being too convenient) Film and stick to my a la carte M7 with one lensecalms down your mind. I then had a feeling that Im sure a lot of people who have too many cameras have once in a while You might know it yourself? The transport lever on the Leica M3. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. An indicator shows you when the device has low battery. If you arent aware of these lenses, they focus down to about 40cm. I didn't do any critical tests, but I feel the M262 may have around one stop advantage at high iso. I will investigate that. Of course there will be technological advances and all kinds of new features. The upgrade to the M10 feels like its based on some fairly thin justifications, though I suspect (hope) that in practice just like swapping from M9 to M262 I will be pleasantly surprised by the fact that I find it brings more to the table than I expected. Possibly Leica got the Bayer filter from a different supplier making the change needed. One has a brightline window, the other does not. The price is$5195/4050. Leica M262 - "A Leica M240 in a Leica M9 body" The Leica M 262 that Leica Camera AG surprisingly introduced November 2015 is basically a Leica M 240 in a Leica M9 body. - Leica M 262 & Voigtlnder 50/1.2. Thank you for pointing me to that review. After the M11 released though, used prices of the M10 dropped and I decided to get one. I keep looking at the 262 as a hidden gem. And if you find the viewfinder better, as many report. Paste as plain text instead, The settings I use (format and manual or auto lens designation) pop up first on the main menu and with 2 clicks both actions are completed. I missed his musings in AP. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. The resolution is given as a compound value, comprised of horizontal and vertical pixels. It does make me wonder if they could have slimmed down this body like the M10, were they to have released this camera as a major upgrade rather than a stripped-back sidestep from the M240. Like most people, I suspect. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. Now, that update costs thousands of dollars. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. I shot film forever and my M2 was my first range finder. Ive had it for a month now. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. You cannot paste images directly. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water. To make pictures, those are good bodies to be used with good lens. Find out more about 35mmc here. More about being to see the settings at a glance, rather than just be able to change them easily. Got a spare lottery ticket? In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. I got the m262 because it has everything i need and nothing i do not need. The M9 and CCD sensor. The smaller file size also allows quicker read/write speeds. There are no 'Landscape', 'Sport', or 'Smile Detection' modes. For example, I am in a coffee shop with the camera sitting on a Manfrotto table top tripod. All other things aside, they, Leica M cameras, are unique. M240 v. M246 v. M262 v. Monochrom 246. The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. (Leica M Typ 240), Nikon D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS, Sony a6600 + Sony E 18-135mm F3__5-5__6 OSS, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSS, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM. If tapping the top plate sounded a bit hollow: remember its aluminium not brass in the 262, Sure. Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. The obvious take-away from the third image set is just how poorly the Leica M246 and Leica M Monochrom renders overexposed highlights. Really useful! I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. On the M240 the highlight from focus peaking is often not apparent at all. My guess is that many of the Leica purists won't be bothered at all by this decision. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. And given the choice between keeping the M262 and the M240, despite what the Leica M240 brings to the table, it doesnt win out over M262. For example, I have seen an as new M240 from a Leica Store for 2,495 and a Voigtlander Ultron 50mm for c.700. I think it is a very cool and stripped down digital M camera that I purchased used to compliment my M3 (I use the M3 with a 50mm and 90mm lens). Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Its. I could sell the M262, and my beloved Monochrom (and maybe a couple of lenses), thus satisfying the GAS problem and simultaneously slimming down my cameras without actually having to spend any more money or as my mate James would say, I could make this a revenue-neutral purchase. Heres some photos: Bear in mind, these have been taken with a load of different lenses:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-leader-3','ezslot_21',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-3-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-leader-2','ezslot_20',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-2-0'); In conclusion, the Leica M262 is a fantastic camera with a great interface with very few issues worth picking holes in. Ultimately, if youre looking for all the bells and whistles, you certainly wont find them on this camera. Live-view with any lens I liked was fun. Is the 262 different in this regard? More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life. Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. Unfortunately, there are elements of the way the ISO modes work that have slightly bothered me.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_13',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); To be fair, the auto ISO is really well implemented. I wont go into too much more detail now, but for saying that unlike the M240 and M262 that Ive otherwise used since the M9, the Leica M10-P really feels like it has []. Good thing, I don't need to upgrade further, as those are plenty enough for many years to come. If not, get the 262. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. My GAS was satisfied with a Z6 with the M-to-Z adapter. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. Ive had it for years and purchased it when M8s were at their lowest prices. They take on a garish orange tint that is hard to process in LR. I'm in between the m262 bundle or a used 240. This is a useful feature for me that I enjoyed using the Fuji system which had a great focus peaking aid. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! Also for helping critical focus wide open at close distance. The only shortcoming relating to the auto ISO function is that sometimes I feel like Id like to be able to see the ISO the camera is choosing on a shot by shot basis. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Its funny, the M262 seems to be the Leica camera that people forget. So, the obvious question: why not the M10-D? Very interesting. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. From what I gather, skin tones have better rendering with the M10. At this point, Leica will probably keep video for its SL series. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. You cannot paste images directly. I completely agree about the thumb rest, adds more (in a bad way) than removing the screen takes away, in my opinion. Value for money, incredible quality. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. Manage Settings Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. If you want video and live view, get the 240. However, the megapixel count is not the only important element determining the quality of an image. - and the M240 in color. To be honest, I think I shared those views and though I might not been inclined to articulate them quite as vociferously as some it was those views that swayed me toward the M262. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. LV is handy for confirming RF calibration. With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to . Just because something new release does not mean the M9 or even the M8 lost theirs. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). With the M9, just going out for a day I would take two batteries. Any chance youre planning to do a write up on that Nokton 50mm f/1.2? 20% better video recording quality (main camera), Has continuous autofocus when recording movies, has continuous autofocus when recording movies. Yes, the M240s menu is busier, but once I have the camera set up to my liking I dont really venture into the menu often. No fuss, just compose and shoot. Controls feel well balanced and satisfyingly precise. . In short, I generally find myself not needing to tweak the colours at all from the M262, which is something I quite appreciate. That, in my opinion, is the Leica M 240's motto. Edit: Since writing this I have been made aware that pressing and holding the ISO button is the quickest way to change ISO. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to add direct access to the white balance feature. That being said, this is pretty much everything I want from a digital camera or any sort of camera for that matter. Because I only shoot raw, I dont need the white balance settings. After more than a month of use it is apparent the M 262 Image quality is better than that of the M-240 (which i have used since it became available). With its excellent dynamic range, beautiful colors, and compact design, it won a lot of fans, but perhaps not . I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. To begin with, I tried put the idea to the back of my mind, then one day I opened the cupboard a saw my Monochrom sat there looking underused. I realised Id only used it once in the last 6 months. It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. Forget is a strong word. Simple. In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. You can get two M-Ps (old and new) for the same price as one M10. When it comes to making video, things are different! I use along the two M240/262/etc. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. It depends on your needs. Menu. I have a X113 and an M262. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers what's best described as a stripped-back user interface. Quick charge with automatic constant current control prevents battery from overcharging, short circuit, and electronic shock But the M9 for me has so many characteristics, beyond specs, iso performance or touchscreen blah blah blah. At0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. Bear in mind I have not held or shot an M10, my information comes from extensive reading of user experiences. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. I upgraded to the M240 from an M9, had it for 3 months and went back to an M9. All of a sudden, the M10 held a lot of appeal. With the wrong card, the wait before the shutter is again available is bad. Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . Thirty days, a new sensor, a new shutter mechanism, and a couple other tweaks and the camera was better than new. I am aware many own the Monochrom and love it to death. I cant keep it my business partner has vetoed that idea. Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. I did find a custom LR preset that helps a lot, but it would be nice to have natural skin tones straight from the camera. Why poor white balance, plus bad color in JPEG files, for Q2 camera? Everything is very tactile. The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. Another M10 fetish. Display as a link instead, Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. I really have found it quite distracting to have an image preview thats different to what Im used to, especially since its both inaccurate and in a way thats unappealing to my tastes. The device is dustproof and water-resistant. There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Unfortunately, this isnt something thats fixed by the M10 either though I am definitely looking forward to how much the M10 improves manual ISO control for me. The Leica M-D Typ 262 was released in 2016 and is already rather difficult to find. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come., [] a moment to reflect on this previous style of photography of mine. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. To seethedifference between Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 cameras we have put together Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 specs comparison tablebelow. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. I too prefer the more stripped back feature set of the M9, M240, and M10. Yes!! Aluminium body makes is nice and light. True Leica again (after the M240), pure and sololy focused on the Photography essentials. I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. A M262 is a friendly camera. Great article as always! The sensor is not the same, by the way. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. . I'm not sure if it's ok to show a snapshot of the LFI article. (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Edward - you are right about the blues and reds. While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). Unsurprisingly, the camera never really made a breakthrough in the video world so perhaps Leica decided it wasn't worth keeping it. As cboy pointed out above, that may limit lens choice. The higher the movie recording bitrate the better the movie quality with more and crispier details and less compression artifacts. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. Pasted as rich text. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Its just become a reason not to use the screen as much as I might have. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. I guess its only really there as it was the most logical thing for Leica to put there in place of the LV live view button on the M240. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. It is the first position on the menu, and setting WB on a grey card or to a preset is a matter of 3 or 4 clicks.Colors. Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. You'd be wise to buy the best/latest digital body you can afford and leave a healthy budget for the best/most lenses possible. My biggest problem with the digital M bodies is I cant use my Summicron DR on them (although, havent tested it on an M10 yet). But even this hasnt really bothered me too much it might be a little clumsy what with the need to press 3 buttons when you want to change ISO, but the way the auto ISO works pretty much makes up for it. The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience. Help us by suggesting a value. It has two memory card slots, allowing you to store more photos without switching cards. Material choices as well as the overall fit and finish are second to none. Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. Looking forward to your impressions, cheers! One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. They arent rangefinder coupled past 1m, but nonetheless they do focus that close. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. This is particularly useful on long shoots when you need more space.

Jeffrey Alvin Bond, Articles L